Where the new money went: PDD and Berkshire
The quarter's only discretionary bets were PDD Holdings and Berkshire Hathaway, and they pull in the same direction. PDD โ the e-commerce platform behind Pinduoduo and Temu โ now takes 22.17% of the book at $820.9M, after shares rose 133.5% and roughly $469.4M of capital went in, even though the position sits 14.2% below Himalaya's blended cost of $98.14.
That is a value buyer adding into a drawdown, not a momentum chaser. Berkshire got the same treatment at smaller scale: shares up 23.5%, $105.4M added, 14.98% of the book, and a 60.6% gain on an average cost of $315.73. One leg is a cheap, cash-generating consumer platform the market has marked down; the other is a balance-sheet fortress the fund already owns at a large profit.
The pairing is the tell. Li Lu is buying cash-generating businesses at discounts to his own estimate of value, and he is willing to be early on the one that hurts. Berkshire is not a new idea โ it is ballast that lets him hold a concentrated, underwater China position without flinching.
Conviction
The big buys
The biggest dollar adds this quarter โ where conviction is rising.
| Position | Change | Portfolio weight | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| PDDPDD HOLDINGS INC | Added 133.5%+$469.4M | 22.2% | $820.9M |
| BRK.BBERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC DEL | Added 23.5%+$105.4M | 15.0% | $554.6M |
Dollar changes estimated at current prices (shares added ร current price); top-50 current positions only.
Nothing sold โ and that is the signal
Look at where the weights fell and you will not find a single sale. Finance slipped from 11.5% to 9.7% and consumer discretionary from 5.2% to 4.4%, yet East West Bancorp, Crocs and Tencent Music all carry identical share counts to the prior quarter. The decline is arithmetic โ roughly $574.7M of additions entered the book and every untouched name was diluted โ not a verdict on banks or footwear.
- East West Bancorp โ 9.68% of the book, $358.4M, unchanged, sitting 128.4% above cost.
- Crocs โ 2.89%, $107.0M, unchanged, 55.7% above cost.
- Tencent Music โ 1.49%, $55.0M, unchanged, 35.4% below cost.
The awkward hold is Tencent Music: neither added to nor cut, still 35.4% underwater. That is a position Li Lu seems content to let ride rather than defend. For anyone reading this 13F, the absence of trims is the signal โ a manager who sold nothing while deploying $574.7M has narrowed his conviction changes to exactly two places, and any genuine change of mind would first appear next quarter as a reduced share count.
The '71% technology' label hides the real rotation
Treat the sector bar chart with suspicion. The screener files Alphabet under technology when it is an advertising and communication-services business, and files PDD under technology when it is Chinese e-commerce. The rotation that actually happened is by company: Alphabet's two share classes went from roughly 56.7% of the book to 47.9%, PDD from 11.2% to 22.2%, and Berkshire from 14.4% to 15.0%.
Read against real-world business lines, the drift is clear:
- China consumer platform exposure โ PDD plus Tencent Music โ rose from about 13.0% to 23.7% of the book.
- US mega-cap internet โ Alphabet plus Apple โ fell from roughly 57.8% to 48.8%.
- Financials, meaning East West Bancorp and arguably Berkshire, slid from about 25.8% to 24.7%.
This is not a sector rotation. It is a single-stock promotion: PDD moved from supporting role to co-equal pillar beside Alphabet, and Berkshire was topped up as a cash-rich hedge against the fund's own concentration. Everything else simply became smaller relative to those two positions.
What the next 13F has to prove
The fund's record gives this concentration some cover: 26.99% annualized over three years and a 10.67% gain in the latest quarter. But the structure is now unusually fragile by design. Nearly half the book sits in one company, another 22.17% sits in a single Chinese e-commerce ADR that is underwater on cost, and there are only eight positions in total.
- If PDD re-rates toward the $98.14 average cost, the fund's returns are made largely on one trade.
- If it does not, there is no second active idea waiting; the Berkshire add is ballast, not a catalyst.
- A real change of mind would show up as a reduced share count in Alphabet or East West Bancorp, and this filing shows none.
The forward read is narrow and legible. Himalaya has stopped running a diversified portfolio and started running a thesis: cheap, cash-generative platforms bought below estimated value, held in size, with Berkshire's balance sheet as the shock absorber. Watch whether next quarter brings a third name into the top tier. Until then, this is an eight-position fund with one swing.
Frequently asked questions
What did Himalaya Capital Management buy in 2026-Q2?+
It added to two existing positions and opened no new ones. PDD Holdings saw its share count rise 133.5% for roughly $469.4M, and Berkshire Hathaway rose 23.5% for about $105.4M.
What is Himalaya Capital Management's biggest holding?+
Alphabet's Class A line (GOOGL) at 24.55% of the book, or $908.9M. Add the Class C line (GOOG) at 23.39% and Alphabet is about 47.9% of the portfolio.
Did Li Lu sell anything in 2026-Q2?+
No visible sale. The other six positions show identical share counts to the prior quarter, so the falling finance (9.68%) and consumer discretionary (4.38%) weights came from dilution, not selling.
How concentrated is Himalaya Capital's portfolio?+
Extremely. Eight positions make up the entire 13F, top-ten concentration is 100%, and Alphabet's two share classes plus PDD come to 70.1% of assets.
How much of Himalaya Capital is invested in China?+
About 23.7%, combining PDD Holdings at 22.17% and Tencent Music at 1.49%. That is roughly double the prior quarter's China weight of about 13.0%.
How has Himalaya Capital Management performed?+
The 13F-weighted book gained 10.67% in 2026-Q2, with 26.99% annualized over three years and 9.93% annualized over five. Reported 13F value stood at $3.70B.