Where conviction is rising: ex-US, AI, and the riskier edges of equity beta
The biggest dollar adds tell a very simple story: they believe the easy US mega-cap trade is behind us, and the next leg of returns will come from ex-US catch-up, AI’s second wave, and riskier parts of the equity spectrum.
They don’t show new single-stock heroes; instead, they scale existing themes:
- IDEV (iShares Core MSCI International Developed) is the single largest add, up 38.6% with about $385.2M of capital, a blunt but clear bet that developed ex-US is too cheap relative to the US.
- AIQ (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology) jumps 16.5%, roughly $179.9M more into a dedicated AI sleeve rather than just relying on the FAANG complex inside broad benchmarks.
- IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets) climbs 9.2%, adding about $88.5M, pushing the book further into higher-volatility EM beta.
- NVDA sees another 3.4% share increase and about $63.6M more, even after a gain vs average cost of 167.5%, signaling they still see upside in the core AI hardware winner.
- DFIV (Dimensional International Value) is up 6.3% (~$51.8M), a pure factor expression that ex-US value can finally work.
- IWM (Russell 2000) gets 6.6% more shares (~$48.9M), a clear move toward small-cap risk after a correction.
- AGG and GOVT together bring in about $85.1M of fresh capital, showing they want dry powder and ballast even as they reach for equity risk elsewhere.
Put together, the adds read like a conviction call on global and AI-driven dispersion: more ex-US, more small caps, more explicit AI, but cushioned with high-quality fixed income.
Conviction
The big buys
The biggest dollar adds this quarter — where conviction is rising.
| Position | Change | Portfolio weight | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| IDEVISHARES TR CORE MSCI | Added 38.6%+$385.2M | 0.8% | $1.38B |
| AIQGLOBAL X FDS | Added 16.5%+$179.9M | 0.7% | $1.27B |
| IEMGISHARES CORE MSCI | Added 9.2%+$88.5M | 0.6% | $1.05B |
| NVDANVIDIA CORPORATION | Added 3.4%+$63.6M | 1.1% | $1.93B |
| DFIVDIMENSIONAL ETF | Added 6.3%+$51.8M | 0.5% | $868.5M |
| IWMISHARES RUSSELL 2000 | Added 6.6%+$48.9M | 0.5% | $790.5M |
| AGGISHARES CORE US | Added 4.6%+$44.8M | 0.6% | $1.03B |
| GOVTISHARES TR US TREAS | Added 3.3%+$40.2M | 0.7% | $1.25B |
Dollar changes estimated at current prices (shares added × current price); top-50 current positions only.
What they’re trimming: broad US beta as the chief funding source
The sells are not a wholesale de-risking; they are a reshuffle out of undifferentiated US exposure and some aging defensives to pay for more pointed bets.
The biggest funding block is straightforward:
- SPY is cut by 4.0%, freeing about $105.6M, a clear willingness to own the S&P 500 less directly.
- IVV, another core S&P 500 tracker, is trimmed slightly (down 0.5%, roughly $55.0M), pushing in the same direction.
- QUAL and DGRW, both quality- and dividend-tilted US equity ETFs, are trimmed by 4.8% and 5.0%, taking out a combined ~$112.8M; that’s a quiet vote that defensive quality has gotten crowded and fully priced.
- IJR and IQLT, representing US small-cap core and international quality, lose 4.9% and 5.1% of shares; instead of vanilla small caps and quality screens, the manager is favoring more targeted vehicles like IWM and DFIV.
On the single-name side, the moves are surgical, not thematic:
- JNJ is cut 3.9% (about $56.8M) while Lilly remains untouched, reinforcing Lilly as the chosen pharma growth engine and JNJ as a source of cash.
- Berkshire Hathaway is trimmed modestly despite being up nearly 992.8% vs average cost, a classic “harvest gains from the compounding machine” move, not a repudiation.
In effect, they are exiting the middle ground: less generic US quality and small-cap beta, more deliberate expressions of where they think the next cycle’s winners reside.
Sector and theme rotation: pharma stays king, but wrappers tell the real story
On the surface, sector weights barely budge: health care nudges from 42.69% to 42.54%, technology holds at 13.25%, and the other classified sectors move by only a few basis points. That stability is deceptive; the real rotation is happening inside the large “unclassified” ETF bucket that now sits at 33.88%.
Within that ETF block, capital is clearly flowing out of broad US and into foreign and factor sleeves. Cuts to SPY, IVV, QUAL, DGRW, IJR, and IWD are offset by larger adds to IDEV, IEMG, DFIV, and IWM, which collectively push more of the book into developed ex-US, emerging markets, international value, and small caps.
Technology exposure via single names is subtly re-optimized rather than expanded. NVDA and AIQ get fresh money, while AAPL and MSFT see tiny trims and Alphabet and Meta get fractional adds, leaving overall tech weight flat but with a tilt toward AI infrastructure and AI-themed ETFs.
Energy is essentially unchanged, with a small rotation from Exxon (trimmed 1.3%) toward Chevron (up 0.6%), while financials see marginal de-risking via JPM. The giant outlier remains Eli Lilly at 27.26% of the entire book, making health care the de facto macro call regardless of what happens at the margin in other sectors.
What this positioning telegraphs about Pnc Financial Services Group INC’s next act
This quarter’s changes read like a manager who thinks the regime has shifted: the US mega-cap, quality-heavy one-way trade is tired, and the next three years of excess return will be driven by ex-US normalization, AI-driven capex cycles, and a more volatile small-cap backdrop.
The portfolio still leans heavily on Eli Lilly as its growth spine and keeps a full complement of broad US index ETFs for baseline exposure. But the incremental dollar is no longer buying “the market”; it is buying specific edges — developed ex-US, EM, international value, small caps, and focused AI — with Treasuries and core bonds added as a stabilizer.
If they are right, this book is now better tuned for dispersion and factor rotation than for a straight beta melt-up. If they are wrong and US large-cap growth resumes uncontested leadership, the trims in SPY, IVV, quality, and some US small-cap core could lag the simplest S&P 500 play.
Either way, the message from the 13F is clear: Pnc Financial Services Group INC is done hiding in broad US benchmarks. The portfolio is being nudged toward a more opinionated, globally diversified, and AI-aware stance, with enough fixed income to ride out the volatility that stance implies.
Frequently asked questions
What is Pnc Financial Services Group INC’s biggest holding in 2026-Q1?+
The largest disclosed holding is Eli Lilly, at 27.26% of the reported 13F portfolio, making health care the dominant sector exposure.
What did Pnc Financial Services Group INC buy in 2026-Q1?+
The fund added most aggressively to IDEV, AIQ, IEMG, NVDA, DFIV, IWM, AGG, and GOVT, increasing exposure to ex-US equities, AI, small caps, and core fixed income.
What did Pnc Financial Services Group INC sell in 2026-Q1?+
Major trims included SPY, IVV, QUAL, DGRW, IJR, IQLT, AVLV, and a reduction in JNJ and Berkshire Hathaway, mainly freeing capital from broad US and quality-factor ETFs.
How is Pnc Financial Services Group INC positioned by sector after 2026-Q1?+
Health care dominates due to Eli Lilly, with technology as the next-largest sector and a substantial portion of assets in ETFs that span US, international, and fixed income markets.
How did Pnc Financial Services Group INC perform recently?+
For 2026-Q1 the reported portfolio return was -10.39%, while the weighted 3-year annualized return remains strong at 21.36%.
Is Pnc Financial Services Group INC increasing or decreasing overall risk?+
They are rotating into riskier equity segments like EM, small caps, and AI while simultaneously adding Treasuries and core bonds, suggesting a barbell approach rather than a simple risk-on or risk-off shift.